TRAVERSE ENGINEERING
POWERED BY TRI™

Where routes fail isn't in the map — it's in the assumptions.

Routes look fine until engineering exposes span, structure, ROW, and crossing issues. TRI finds likely redesign drivers early so teams can verify the right segments before the clock and budget get burned.

Redesigns happen late

Constraints surface after engineering starts, when changes are most expensive.

Feasibility assumes constructability

Cost models break when ROW, crossings, and spans aren't validated.

Fielding is precious

TRI tells you where to verify first to reduce surprises.

What you get with a TRI Report

Decision-ready deliverables for engineering teams.

01

TRI Score

Overall and category-level readiness scoring that quantifies route risk across multiple dimensions.

02

Assumptions Ledger

Explicit documentation of span, structure, ROW, and crossing assumptions that drive your route design.

03

Risk-Flagged KMZ

Visual map with color-coded risk segments showing exactly where validation is needed most.

04

Engineering Next Actions

Prioritized list of verification points to address before committing to detailed design.

Feasibility support — without guesswork

TRI is not a feasibility study. It supports feasibility and early design by validating route assumptions and highlighting constructability risk before budgets and scopes are finalized.

Think of TRI as the validation layer feasibility teams wish they had.

Why TRI vs. Traditional Engineering?

The difference between proactive validation and expensive rework

Traditional Approach
Wait for full design
Find problems
Costly rework
Typical redesign cost
$50,000 - $150,000
Plus 3-6 week delays
TRI Approach
Validate assumptions first
Fix issues early
Design once, build fast
TRI investment
$3,500 - $18,500
Average ROI: 10:1

The math is simple

Pay $8,500 now to avoid $75,000+ in redesign costs later. Most clients recover their TRI investment on the first avoided change order.

Get Started with TRI →

When to Request TRI

Ideal timing for maximum ROI on your fiber build

📋

Before BEAD grant applications

Validate route assumptions before locking in budgets and timelines for federal funding applications.

🗺️

When evaluating multiple routes

Compare 2-3 route options to identify which has the lowest construction risk and highest feasibility.

After feasibility, before design

Bridge the gap between high-level feasibility and detailed engineering with targeted risk assessment.

⚠️

For high-risk corridors

Mountains, urban areas, railroad crossings, or environmentally sensitive zones benefit most from TRI.

How TRI works

Three steps from route submission to actionable insights

1

Submit your route

Provide your route in KML, KMZ, GeoJSON, or corridor description format. Include any known constraints or priorities.

2

Analyze route risk

We evaluate spans, geometry, crossings, ROW indicators, and identify segments most likely to require redesign.

3

Deliver TRI artifacts

Receive a client-ready PDF report and annotated KMZ file with actionable next steps for your engineering team.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about TRI™ route validation.

What is TRI™?

TRI™ (Traverse Route Intelligence) is a pre-engineering route validation report that scores fiber route risk, exposes hidden assumptions, and reduces redesigns before OSP engineering begins. It provides decision-ready deliverables including TRI Score, Assumptions Ledger, risk-flagged KMZ, and engineering next actions.

How much does TRI cost?

TRI pricing ranges from $3,500 for TRI Lite (early route screening) to $8,500 for TRI Standard (full readiness scoring plus KMZ) to $18,500 for TRI Pro (high-risk or grant corridors). Most clients recover the TRI cost on their first avoided redesign.

Is TRI a feasibility study?

No, TRI is not a feasibility study. It supports feasibility and early design by validating route assumptions and highlighting constructability risk before budgets and scopes are finalized. Think of TRI as the validation layer feasibility teams wish they had.

What deliverables do I receive with TRI?

TRI delivers four key artifacts: 1) TRI Score with overall and category-level readiness scoring, 2) Assumptions Ledger documenting explicit span, structure, ROW, and crossing assumptions, 3) Risk-Flagged KMZ visual map of high-risk route segments, and 4) Engineering Next Actions identifying where to verify first to avoid redesigns.

How long does a TRI report take?

TRI reports are delivered in days, not weeks. The exact timeline depends on route complexity and package selected, but our process is designed for rapid turnaround to support time-sensitive fiber infrastructure projects.

Who uses TRI?

TRI is built for OSP managers and engineering teams working on fiber optic infrastructure projects including FTTx, small cell deployment, and telecom builds. It's particularly valuable for teams managing BEAD grants and other large-scale fiber initiatives.

What file formats can I submit for route analysis?

TRI accepts KML, KMZ, and GeoJSON file formats. You can also provide a corridor description if you don't yet have a formatted route file. Our team will work with you to ensure we have the necessary route information for accurate analysis.

Is TRI stamped engineering?

No, TRI is advisory assessment only and is not stamped engineering. TRI provides decision support and risk identification to inform your engineering process, but does not replace field verification, detailed engineering design, or permitting approvals.

Pricing

Investment that pays for itself on the first avoided redesign.

TRI Lite

$3,500

Early route screening for quick decisions

Best for: Initial route viability assessment
  • Basic risk assessment
  • High-level assumptions review
  • PDF summary report
  • 3-5 day turnaround
Typical savings:
$25K - $50K

TRI Pro

$18,500

Comprehensive analysis for complex projects

Best for: High-risk terrain, multi-route comparison
  • Everything in Standard
  • Multi-scenario analysis
  • Grant compliance review
  • Consultation call included
  • 7-10 day turnaround
Typical savings:
$150K - $300K
Plus faster project timelines

TRI Accuracy Guarantee

90%+

Of flagged risks confirmed in field verification

15+

Years of OSP engineering experience backing every report

Free

Next report if TRI misses a major constraint